For my birthday this year, my wife and my parents finally came to there senses and just bought me whiskey. It's the no-fail option. Ironically, though, they bought me the same whiskey. Now, I've always had a lukewarm relationship with Irish whiskey. The older Jameson's are nice, but I've never really ran into an Irish I'd go out of my way for. Irish whiskey always seems to be aiming for unassuming - and that's not me.
But I've been really, really pleasantly surprised by Redbreast.
First, some background. Irish whiskey is a pretty loose term - unlike Scotch or Bourbon, basically any grain can be used and any aging method is fine, so long as it's aged three years and Irish born and bred.* Redbreast is a "pure pot still" whiskey, meaning there's no grain mixed in (unlike all other Irish whiskey but Green Spot).. There's likely blending of different ages and maturations, though, making this more akin to a vatted malt than a single malt. Irish whiskey (Redbreast included) is also almost always triple distilled, where Scotch is only generally only distilled twice. This in part accounts for the smoothness of Irish whiskey and the greater complexity of Scotch - there are more fermentation products sneaking in that bottle of Lagvulin than the Bushmill's.
Back to the bottle at hand. The nose has light pepper, honey, and caramelized milk. The palate has prominent sherry, cake, a little lemony toffee, and just a dash of pepper. On the whole very mild, very smooth, but with some real depth and complexity - unlike pretty much any other Irish but Middleton and some of Bushmill's older bottles. There's a little oiliness as well, and it's a nice touch - it draws out the finish, without being overbearing like younger Laphroig can be (if you aren't accustomed to it). The bottom line - this is smooth, easy-drinking whiskey with enough depth to still interest the connoisseur.
If you like whiskey, you'll really enjoy this. But if you like Jameson, Bushmill's, or even Canadian Whisky, you'll love this stuff. 7.5 out of 9.
Showing posts with label Whiskey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whiskey. Show all posts
Friday, April 29, 2011
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Beverage of the Week: Henry McKenna 10 Year Single Barrel
Before I dig into this week's bourbon: last night an amazing, happy event occured. I walked into the Sparrow and what should greet my eyes but "New Albanian 15B Porter" on the chalkboard. Oh, happy day.
Anyway, sticking with the notion that the BoW should have relatively wide availability, this week we have Henry McKenna's single barrel offering. This is another excellent, affordable offering from Heaven Hill Distilleries, makers of my all-time favorite value whiskey, Evan William's Single Barrel. This is also very nice stuff at a reasonable price (~$30), but I chose it as much to talk about marketing as the whiskey itself.
For starters, this whiskey makes a big fuss about being "bottled in bond." Legally, this means it is 1) the product of a single distillery, 2) the product of one distillation season, and 3) bottled at 100 proof. As you can imagine, aside from the 100 proof bit (which is mostly irrelevant), every single barrel whiskey on the market could be called "bottled in bond," as could the majority of small batch whiskeys, and quite a few regular-old age dated products. HK makes it sound like this status is the holy grail of whiskey, however, and I think this is an excellent example of how aggressive and misleading advertising is getting as the premium whiskey market swells with new products. Another interesting thing about this product - the billing leads you to believe this is a sort of Irish bourbon recipe, an idea furthered by the attractive green packaging. I have never heard of any Irish whiskey made from corn, and tasting-wise this has about as much in common with Irish whiskey as Captain Morgan. I enjoyed this whiskey quite a bit, but caveat emptor nonetheless.
Back to the tasting. I really enjoy the nose on this - for a higher proof whiskey, you can really get into it without catching any of that alcohol sear in your nostrils. There's the a maple-forward note, and a hint of dark chocolate down there too. The mouth feel is great, with a thickness that reminds me of Booker's. The palate is nice as well, though it is definitely less complex than say a Van Winkle, or Evan Williams Single Barrel, for that matter. It's very focused on sweetness, with toffee, honey, and vanilla predominating. The alcohol comes out more on the palate than the nose, though, so I wouldn't hesitate to bring it down a bit with some water. All in all, a 7/9 - a great everyday bourbon. My favorite thing is that it is just good enough to really enjoy but not so good I'm tempted to hoard it back (hence the near-empty bottle).
Oh, and this was from barrel #358.
Anyway, sticking with the notion that the BoW should have relatively wide availability, this week we have Henry McKenna's single barrel offering. This is another excellent, affordable offering from Heaven Hill Distilleries, makers of my all-time favorite value whiskey, Evan William's Single Barrel. This is also very nice stuff at a reasonable price (~$30), but I chose it as much to talk about marketing as the whiskey itself.
For starters, this whiskey makes a big fuss about being "bottled in bond." Legally, this means it is 1) the product of a single distillery, 2) the product of one distillation season, and 3) bottled at 100 proof. As you can imagine, aside from the 100 proof bit (which is mostly irrelevant), every single barrel whiskey on the market could be called "bottled in bond," as could the majority of small batch whiskeys, and quite a few regular-old age dated products. HK makes it sound like this status is the holy grail of whiskey, however, and I think this is an excellent example of how aggressive and misleading advertising is getting as the premium whiskey market swells with new products. Another interesting thing about this product - the billing leads you to believe this is a sort of Irish bourbon recipe, an idea furthered by the attractive green packaging. I have never heard of any Irish whiskey made from corn, and tasting-wise this has about as much in common with Irish whiskey as Captain Morgan. I enjoyed this whiskey quite a bit, but caveat emptor nonetheless.
Back to the tasting. I really enjoy the nose on this - for a higher proof whiskey, you can really get into it without catching any of that alcohol sear in your nostrils. There's the a maple-forward note, and a hint of dark chocolate down there too. The mouth feel is great, with a thickness that reminds me of Booker's. The palate is nice as well, though it is definitely less complex than say a Van Winkle, or Evan Williams Single Barrel, for that matter. It's very focused on sweetness, with toffee, honey, and vanilla predominating. The alcohol comes out more on the palate than the nose, though, so I wouldn't hesitate to bring it down a bit with some water. All in all, a 7/9 - a great everyday bourbon. My favorite thing is that it is just good enough to really enjoy but not so good I'm tempted to hoard it back (hence the near-empty bottle).
Oh, and this was from barrel #358.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Beverage of the Week: Glenlivet Nadurra (16y)
This week's BoW comes from my liver's spiritual home: Scotland. Well, more accurately that'd be Islay, Scotland - but close enough. A fairly recent addition to Glenlivet's bottling roster, Nadurra (gaelic for natural) is an excellent introduction to several of my favorite stylistic touches. Plus, it's more accessible than similar whiskey's I might personally prefer - availability, fiscally, and pallate-wise.
First off, Nadurra is cask-strength, meaning it's bottled just as it comes out of the aging barrel (spirits are normally cut with water to homogenize alcohol content). Such whiskey's are potent, and I'll be the first to recommend adding a little water yourself to dig the flavors out from beneath the ethanol. But the best thing about cask-strength is you can work your own magic with (clean, room-temp) water and explore all the flavors to your preference. Most whiskey "opens" as you add water; I recommend trying any glass straight and adding in increments to see what you find.
Secondly, this is non-chill filtered. Personally, I find such whiskeys a bit cleaner (though one might think the opposite would be true). It's certainly paler in the glass than Glenivet's other offerings, and underneath the 58% or so alcohol, I find the flavors a bit more delicate. Also note this is a Speyside whiskey, and a much truer expression of the area than the standard 12 year bottling, or the 15y French oak.
Okay, so my notes: the nose is definately full of toffee - to be expected with ex-bourbon barrel aging - but there's also a hint of vanilla, and a floral note I'd prolly be able to name if I wasn't too manly to know about flowers. It's very light on the pallate; there's a decide pecan-like nuttiness and some whole cream. Verdict: 7.5/9
First off, Nadurra is cask-strength, meaning it's bottled just as it comes out of the aging barrel (spirits are normally cut with water to homogenize alcohol content). Such whiskey's are potent, and I'll be the first to recommend adding a little water yourself to dig the flavors out from beneath the ethanol. But the best thing about cask-strength is you can work your own magic with (clean, room-temp) water and explore all the flavors to your preference. Most whiskey "opens" as you add water; I recommend trying any glass straight and adding in increments to see what you find.
Secondly, this is non-chill filtered. Personally, I find such whiskeys a bit cleaner (though one might think the opposite would be true). It's certainly paler in the glass than Glenivet's other offerings, and underneath the 58% or so alcohol, I find the flavors a bit more delicate. Also note this is a Speyside whiskey, and a much truer expression of the area than the standard 12 year bottling, or the 15y French oak.
Okay, so my notes: the nose is definately full of toffee - to be expected with ex-bourbon barrel aging - but there's also a hint of vanilla, and a floral note I'd prolly be able to name if I wasn't too manly to know about flowers. It's very light on the pallate; there's a decide pecan-like nuttiness and some whole cream. Verdict: 7.5/9
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

